"Design in Practice" by Rich Hickey

Rich Hickey has a section on using good words, on not using nicknames, in his (as ever wonderful) Clojure Conj 2023 talk Design in Practice, [VIDEO]

A good approach to making decisions in a team context (also works for personal use) is explained by Rich Hickey here: [VIDEO] The talks is called "Design in Practice" but is really about making decisions.

I experienced this in Scrum planning, daily standups, and other rituals were done with Excel shared via Zoom (or similar) meetings. The Scrum Master would ask each team member a question (e.g. estimation, etc.) and then fill the Excel while online, wasting everyone's time. Same with planning, there will be some basic template for a sprint, and it will be filled with the estimations/Jira tickets during the online meeting! Given said that, there are some valid uses for shared spreadsheets in Product/SDLC. One method I used is specific for data engineering projects: the product fills Excel/Google Spreadsheet with the example input, output shapes in the form of tables, and the developers asking question while they arriving to common spec. Another is called Decision Matrix (almost as old as Periodic Table;), which was recently popularized by Rich Hickey in his talk Design in Practice[1,2]. Another valid usecase for shared spreadsheets is Use Cases table. --- [1] [VIDEO] [2] slide #31 [LINK]

Reminds on Rich Hickey ranting about touch screens in cars [1] in Design in Practice: > We do not have feature X" is never a valid problem statement. If you need proof of this you only need to look at a modern car which has a touch screen where no one said, "I need to slide my finger on some random piece of glass to a precise point to set my blower in my car while I am driving." No one has ever said that, right? But somebody did say, "We need touch screens because young people will never buy our cars." This is what happens when you are not talking about the problem. [1]: [VIDEO]