
Dear America... | David Mitchell's SoapBox
About this video
A three-minute David Mitchell's Soapbox rant addressed to Americans about the phrase "could care less", arguing it means the opposite of what speakers intend. Delivered as dry British comic commentary on language usage.
Why it appears in the archive
HN uses it as the go-to link, often jokingly, whenever someone writes "could care less" instead of "couldn't care less".
AI-generated summary and labels from the source dataset; verify important details against the video. Source & credits.
From the Hacker News discussion
> I could care less, ... I don't want to be "that guy" and I'm not trying to be a grammar Nazi. I know this is now an idiom in the USA, and therefore it doesn't have to make sense. However ... I've now heard it said, in four different countries, that this phrase makes the speaker sound like an idiot. I know it's now just "the norm" in the USA, but I wanted to let people here know that saying this makes a bad impression. If you don't care how you sound to non USAians then don't bother. But if you're wondering what I'm talking about, David Mitchell does an excellent job of explaining "I couldn't care less" [VIDEO] I now return you to your normal programming.
Read original comment ↗But "I could care less" is a perfectly grammatical sentence, which has a semantic meaning, which, as David Mitchell explains at comic length, is the opposite of what the speaker means to say. [VIDEO]
Read original comment ↗I think we agree with each other. Words like "ain't" entering the common lexicon (usually in spoken english) is fine by me ie. Words formed out of contractions of other words/phrases, or entirely new inventions. What I mostly get riled up about are words or phrases that are just plain wrong, but that have been used so widely that some dictionaries have accepted them as correct. Eg: [VIDEO]
Read original comment ↗In the simplest case, the thing referred to is 'a think', and they're entirely equivalent :) I'd argue that this is more of an Eggcorn[1] than a malapropism, unlike your second example. "The proof is in the pudding", or the classic "Could care less"[2] are the two worst offenders I can think of immediately. [1] [LINK] [2] [VIDEO]
Read original comment ↗Aside from Apple vs Google, David Mitchell discusses this curious form of expression with graphs and what-not: [VIDEO]
Read original comment ↗It's "couldn't care less". When you say "could care less" you are endorsing the claim of American Kids Getting Dumber. If you still don't get it: [VIDEO]
Read original comment ↗"I could care less if this is open source" David Mitchell explains why this phrase makes no sense and means exactly that opposite of what you want to say: [VIDEO]
Read original comment ↗>Meanwhile, 50 million people could care less what's inside an iPad. I assume you mean ' couldn't care less'. [1] [1] [VIDEO]
Read original comment ↗