Good videos, with context.
I'm Just a Bill (Schoolhouse Rock!)

I'm Just a Bill (Schoolhouse Rock!)

TheGreatWorker
1 HN recommenders · discussed 2013–2024
Open YouTube ↗

About this video

The Schoolhouse Rock! cartoon song 'I'm Just a Bill', in which a bill explains how it travels through Congress to become law.

Why it appears in the archive

Cited as a classic, catchy explainer of the US legislative process, and half-jokingly as many people's whole civics education.

AI-generated summary and labels from the source dataset; verify important details against the video. Source & credits.

From the Hacker News discussion

adestefan · 2013-07 · strong rec

One of the best School House Rocks videos ever is "I'm Just a Bill." [VIDEO] There are two things missing: 1. Congress can override a Presidential veto with a vote a two-thirds majority in the both chambers. 2. The President can also let a Bill sit for 11 or 12 days (it's really 10, but Sundays don't count.) At that point it becomes law without the President's signature.

Read original comment ↗
ooterness · 2024-05 · reference

A "law" has been finalized, passed by both halves of Congress, and ratified. A "bill" is an incomplete proposal at any stage of this process. There is a catchy song [1] to help everyone remember this. A bill is the same as a pull request that has not yet been merged. So the statement, "The U.S. [has] yet to pass even a basic internet-era privacy law..." is correct. In other words: The American Privacy Rights Act is just a bill, yes it's only a bill, and it's sitting there on Capitol Hill... [1] [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
doug1001 · 2013-02 · joke

disclaimer: my understanding of the legislative process is based entirely on Schoolhouse Rock's "I'm Just a Bill" ( [VIDEO] ). so a citizen's access to a particular DC statute is impossible without that citizen infringing a copyright? I wonder if circumstances such as these would constitute "fair use" (which as i understand it is a valid defense to copyright infringement). also, i'm aware that doing things that would otherwise constitute intellectual property infringement, can be justified by the "Essential Facilities" doctrine--originally an Anti-Trust safe harbor, though it's also been applied to IP. This seems to apply here.

Read original comment ↗