Good videos, with context.
In Search of Tomorrow

In Search of Tomorrow

Berkeley Institute for Data Science (BIDS)
9 HN recommenders · discussed 2015–2018
Open YouTube ↗

About this video

Chris Granger, creator of Light Table and the Eve language, gives a Berkeley data science lecture on what computation and programming might look like in ten years. He covers the path that led to Eve and ends with demos.

Why it appears in the archive

HN keeps pointing to it as a thoughtful vision of programming for non-programmers and as background on Eve's motivations.

AI-generated summary and labels from the source dataset; verify important details against the video. Source & credits.

From the Hacker News discussion

kybernetikos · 2016-10 · strong rec

I absolutely loved the semantic wiki stuff that was shown towards the end of the "In search of tomorrow" video. This seems fairly different to that system. Is there a write up/talk about why you changed? Is there anything like that semantic wiki thing available for me to use? [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
dangoor · 2015-12 · rec

Chris Granger's latest experiments with Eve (github.com/witheve) look surprisingly like a semi-structured personal knowledge system. Take a look at the last 15 minutes or so of this video for a demo: [VIDEO] (the whole video is interesting for the evolution of it)

Read original comment ↗
lewisl9029 · 2015-12 · rec

I just came across this a few days ago on HN: [VIDEO] [LINK] Eve, the new "programming" tool developed by Chris Granger of Light Table fame, looks absolutely amazing for this use case. I personally can't wait to try it out.

Read original comment ↗
giblet · 2015-12 · rec

A talk by Chris Granger in Dec 2015 trying to answer "What does programming look like in 10 years?" was interesting. < [VIDEO] A recent iteration < [VIDEO] looks wiki-like.

Read original comment ↗
cmaury · 2016-03 · rec

There are a lot of professional developers who are blind. They use accessible IDEs paired with a Screen reader. Here is a good description: [LINK] In the future, I think there is a lot of potential for pairing a Conversational UI and a natural language programming...language. Eve looks really promising, and could change the way that everyone writes software, and not just the blind: [LINK] Here is a demo: [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
michaelwww · 2016-03 · rec

This article reminded me of an interesting video by Chris Granger, co-author of the Light Table code editor, titled "In Search of Tomorrow: What does programming look like in 10 years?" He's designing a visual/code block hybrid editor. [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
lewisl9029 · 2016-05 · rec

Eve [1] is one project I know of that has been trying to tackle this very difficult problem. The project is led by Chris Granger, whom you might know from his work on the Light Table IDE [2]. They released a video last year that showcased some iterations of their prototypes and I found them to be very innovative and promising: [VIDEO] [1] [LINK] [2] [LINK]

Read original comment ↗
rafaelferreira · 2016-10 · rec

Seeing Eve's development out in the open is inspiring. Many of the commenters are coming from positions of extreme skepticism towards new approaches to programming, probably justified by the history of the field, but I'd recommend to spend some more time looking into the research idbknox and his team have been conducting (see [VIDEO] , for instance) and how much they have iterated based on user experimentation. A few questions come to mind now: 1 - This new demo, with the messaging app sample, and references to "my pm wants this or that" seems to point a change in positioning, from targeting non-programmers to professional programmers. Is this accurate? 2 - Is there a plan to integrate the grid-style or the adlibs style UI into this new iteration? 3 - If non-programmers are still a target, it seems to me that the ease of importing data from external sources would important to reach broad usage. Any research here? 4 - Html and css might be a hurdles for new users, any way Eve will help on this front? (edited for formatting)

Read original comment ↗